查看文章

Evaluating and comparing multi-objective optimizers is an important issue. But, when doing a comparison, it has to be noted that the results can be influenced highly by the selected Quality Indicator. Therefore, the impact of individual Quality Indicators on the ranking of Multi-objective Optimizers in the proposed method must be analyzed beforehand. In this paper the comparison of several different Quality Indicators with a method called Chess Rating System for Evolutionary Algorithms (CRS4EAs) was conducted in order to get a better insight on their characteristics and how they affect the ranking of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs). Although it is expected that Quality Indicators with the same optimization goals would yield a similar ranking of MOEAs, it has been shown that results can be contradictory and significantly different. Consequently, revealing that claims about the superiority of one MOEA …