查看文章

The quality of the statistical reporting is poor in various biomedical journals, this being a problem stressed by numerous studies. Our aim was to evaluate all pharmaceutical papers published in six Romanian journals, in 2013, for statistical reporting. We used mainly the “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature”–SAMPL-guideline to assess the statistical reporting in the respective original pharmaceutical papers. We found 170 original articles from which 134 (78.82%) reported statistical results. The most frequently used tests were ANOVA (50.9%), and t-test (37.7%). Confirming that the assumptions of the test were met by the data was not reported in 87.6% of the papers. The most important error found in the papers using hypothesis testing, was choosing the wrong statistical test (39.6%). The findings were similar to other published studies. The quality of reporting statistical analyses of pharmaceutical papers published in Romanian journals should be improved, in order to reduce the errors in studies, improve the methodology and clarity.