作者
Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto, Emelie Engström, Ivan do Carmo Machado, Eduardo Santana De Almeida
发表日期
2013/10/1
期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
卷号
86
期号
10
页码范围
2594-2610
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Background
Systematic literature reviews and systematic mapping studies are becoming increasingly common in software engineering, and hence it becomes even more important to better understand the reliability of such studies.
Objective
This paper presents a study of two systematic mapping studies to evaluate the reliability of mapping studies and point out some challenges related to this type of study in software engineering.
Method
The research is based on an in-depth case study of two published mapping studies on software product line testing.
Results
We found that despite the fact that the two studies are addressing the same topic, there are quite a number of differences when it comes to papers included and in terms of classification of the papers included in the two mapping studies.
Conclusions
From this we conclude that although mapping studies are important, their reliability cannot simply be taken for …
引用总数
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024191817231628303332168
学术搜索中的文章
C Wohlin, P Runeson, PAMS Neto, E Engström… - Journal of Systems and Software, 2013