作者
Vanessa M Brown, Jiazhou Chen, Claire M Gillan, Rebecca B Price
发表日期
2020/6/1
期刊
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
卷号
5
期号
6
页码范围
601-609
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Background
Computational models show great promise in mapping latent decision-making processes onto dissociable neural substrates and clinical phenotypes. One prominent example in reinforcement learning is model-based planning, which specifically relates to transdiagnostic compulsivity. However, the reliability of computational model-derived measures such as model-based planning is unclear. Establishing reliability is necessary to ensure that such models measure stable, traitlike processes, as assumed in computational psychiatry. Although analysis approaches affect validity of reinforcement learning models and reliability of other task-based measures, their effect on reliability of reinforcement learning models of empirical data has not been systematically studied.
Methods
We first assessed within- and across-session reliability and effects of analysis approaches (model estimation, parameterization, and …
引用总数
20202021202220232024617232911
学术搜索中的文章