作者
Michael Diamond, Rita Chen, Emma Winkler, James Case, Ishmael Aziati, Traci Bricker, Astha Joshi, Tamarand Darling, Baoling Ying, John Errico, Swathi Shrihari, Laura VanBlargan, Xuping Xie, Pavlo Gilchuk, Seth Zost, Lindsay Droit, Zhuoming Liu, Spencer Stumpf, David Wang, Scott Handley, W Stine, Pei-Yong Shi, Miguel Garcia-Knight, Raul Andino, Charles Chiu, Ali Ellebedy, Daved Fremont, Sean Whelan, James Crowe, Lisa Purcell, Davide Corti, Andrianus Boon
发表日期
2021
简介
Rapidly-emerging variants jeopardize antibody-based countermeasures against SARS-CoV-2. While recent cell culture experiments have demonstrated loss of potency of several anti-spike neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variant strains1-3, the in vivo significance of these results remains uncertain. Here, using a panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) corresponding to many in advanced clinical development by Vir Biotechnology, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, and Lilly we report the impact on protection in animals against authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants including WA1/2020 strains, a B. 1.1. 7 isolate, and chimeric strains with South African (B. 1.351) or Brazilian (B. 1.1. 28) spike genes. Although some individual mAbs showed reduced or abrogated neutralizing activity against B. 1.351 and B. 1.1. 28 viruses with E484K spike protein mutations in cell culture, low prophylactic doses of mAb combinations protected against infection in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, 129S2 immunocompetent mice, and hamsters without emergence of resistance. Two exceptions were mAb LY-CoV555 monotherapy which lost all protective activity in vivo, and AbbVie 2B04/47D11, which showed partial loss of activity. When administered after infection as therapy, higher doses of mAb cocktails protected in vivo against viruses displaying a B. 1.351 spike gene. Thus, many, but not all, of the antibody products with Emergency Use Authorization should retain substantial efficacy against the prevailing SARS-CoV-2 variant strains.
学术搜索中的文章