查看文章

Methods

Seventy-five participants (42 children) were equipped with two Axivity AX3 accelerometers; one attached to their thigh, and one to their lower back. Ten activity trials (eg, sitting, standing, lying, walking, running) were performed while under direct observation in a lab setting. Various time-and frequency-domain features were computed from raw accelerometer data, which were then used to train a random forest machine learning classifier. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. The efficacy of the dual-sensor protocol (relative to single sensors) was evaluated by repeating the modeling process with each sensor individually.

Results

Machine learning models were able to differentiate between six distinct activity classes with exceptionally high accuracy in both adults (99.1%) and children (97.3%). When a single thigh or back accelerometer was used, there was a pronounced drop in accuracy for nonambulatory activities (up to a 26.4% decline). When examining the features used for model training, those that took the orientation of both sensors into account concurrently were more important predictors.

Conclusions

When previous wear time compliance results are taken together with our findings, it represents a promising step forward for monitoring and understanding 24-h time-use behaviors. The next step will be to examine the generalizability of these findings in a free-living setting.