作者
Glyn Lawson, Paul Herriotts, Louise Malcolm, Katharina Gabrecht, Setia Hermawati
发表日期
2015/5/1
期刊
Applied ergonomics
卷号
48
页码范围
240-251
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Ease of entry and exit is important for creating a positive first impression of a car and increasing customer satisfaction. Several methods are used within vehicle development to optimise ease of entry and exit, including CAD reviews, benchmarking and buck trials. However, there is an industry trend towards digital methods to reduce the costs and time associated with developing physical prototypes. This paper reports on a study of entry strategy in three properties (buck, car, CAVE) in which inconsistencies were demonstrated by people entering a vehicle representation in the CAVE. In a second study industry practitioners rated the CAVE as worse than physical methods for identifying entry and exit issues, and having lower perceived validity and reliability. However, the resource issues associated with building bucks were recognised. Recommendations are made for developing the CAVE and for combinations of …
引用总数
20152016201720182019202020212022202320242563668561