作者
Amarit Tansawet, Pawin Numthavaj, Suphakarn Techapongsatorn, Chumpon Wilasrusmee, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian
发表日期
2020/11/1
来源
International Journal of Surgery
卷号
83
页码范围
144-151
出版商
No longer published by Elsevier
简介
Background
Mesh can be used to prevent incisional hernia (IH) occurrence. However, the effect of various mesh positions has never been compared. This study aimed to compare and rank the effect and safety of various mesh-augmented fascia closure techniques on hernia prophylaxis in midline laparotomy.
Methods
MEDLINE and SCOPUS were searched from inception to December 2019. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were eligible if they met the following criteria: comparison of any of the following interventions: onlay (OM), retrorectus (RM), preperitoneal (PM), intraperitoneal mesh (IM) augmentation, and primary suture closure (PSC); and reporting on any of these outcomes: IH, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and dehiscence. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A two-stage random-effect network meta-analysis was performed, then intervention effects were pooled …
引用总数
2020202120222023202415441