查看文章

A VANET is observed an adequate solution to the cooperative driving among communicating cars on road. Organizing road network and testing these networks, typically known as (VANETs), contains a high cost in real world, so the simulation is valuable alternative in research. Our investigation demonstrates the comparison between the GPCR-MA routing networks and attack resilient and efficient protocol (GPCR-ARE) routing network based on different parameter of mobility model that is Freeway, Gauss Markov, Manhattan, Random Waypoint Mobility Model (RWMM) and Reference Point Group Mobility (RPGM) for simulation and analyzed the performance results. The solution of GPCR-ARE are verified with the help of implementation and simulation using network simulator (NS-2.35). Here demonstrate the two scenarios 1) GPCR-MA network scenario. 2) GPCR-ARE network scenarios. This comparison carried between the GPCR-MA and GPCR-ARE based on QOS parameter performance in the presence of attack resilient and efficient protocol. The QoS performances are low in GPCR-ARE as compare to GPCR-MA with respect to network traffic density, and variation of simulation time, its decrease the performance of the network. The simulation results show that RPGM Mobility-Model with GPCR-MA and GPCR-ARE in Vehicular Network.