作者
Mary E Rinella, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Vlad Ratziu, Sven M Francque, Arun J Sanyal, Fasiha Kanwal, Diana Romero, Manal F Abdelmalek, Quentin M Anstee, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Ramon Bataller, Ulrich Beuers, Jerome Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Christopher D Byrne, Graciela E Castro Narro, Abhijit Chowdhury, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Donna R Cryer, Kenneth Cusi, Mohamed El-Kassas, Samuel Klein, Wayne Eskridge, Jiangao Fan, Samer Gawrieh, Cynthia D Guy, Stephen A Harrison, Seung Up Kim, Bart G Koot, Marko Korenjak, Kris V Kowdley, Florence Lacaille, Rohit Loomba, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Timothy R Morgan, Elisabeth E Powell, Michael Roden, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Marcelo Silva, Shivaram Prasad Singh, Silvia C Sookoian, C Wendy Spearman, Dina Tiniakos, Luca Valenti, Miriam B Vos, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Stavra Xanthakos, Yusuf Yilmaz, Zobair Younossi, Ansley Hobbs, Marcela Villota-Rivas, Philip N Newsome, NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group
发表日期
2023/12/1
来源
Hepatology
卷号
78
期号
6
页码范围
1966-1986
出版商
LWW
简介
The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms “nonalcoholic …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章