作者
Kibby McMahon, Azzurra Ruggeri, Juliane E Kämmer, Konstantinos V Katsikopoulos
发表日期
2016/7/2
期刊
Creativity Research Journal
卷号
28
期号
3
页码范围
247-257
出版商
Routledge
简介
Brainstorming research has claimed that individuals are more creative than groups. However, these conclusions are largely based on measuring creativity by the number of ideas generated, and researchers have tended to neglect other important components of creativity, such as the quality of developed ideas. These studies aim to address this gap in the literature and investigate how well individuals and groups develop ideas. The first study compared collaborative groups, nominal groups (i.e., groups composed of individuals working separately), and individuals on developing an original design for a language-learning game. No differences were revealed between conditions on the game ratings. In the second study, one idea was preselected and given to the participants for further development. Groups received higher ratings in the marketability and overall categories than both nominal groups and individuals …
引用总数
20162017201820192020202120222023202423511129593
学术搜索中的文章
K McMahon, A Ruggeri, JE Kämmer, KV Katsikopoulos - Creativity Research Journal, 2016