作者
U Raja, R Sheikh, M Abbas, D & Bouckenooghe
发表日期
2018/4
期刊
European Review of Applied Psychology
卷号
68
期号
2
页码范围
79-88
出版商
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S116290881830015X
简介
Introduction
Researchers agree that procedural justice and distributive justice interact so that high procedural fairness reduces the negative consequences of distributive unfairness.
Objectives
Our objective was to test the hypothesis that employees in Pakistan (i.e., an underdeveloped economy) would be more focused on rewards than procedures. Therefore, procedural and distributive justice will not interact in predicting employee behaviors.
Methods
Using independent measures for organizational justice and job outcomes, we conducted two field surveys (= 372 and n = 550 paired responses) in Pakistan to examine the direct and combined effects of procedural and distributive justice on job performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity.
Results
In both studies, the results suggest that distributive justice is a more consistent and relatively stronger predictor of job outcomes as compared to procedural justice. The …
引用总数
2020202120222023202471212103