作者
Na Cai, Joana A Revez, Mark J Adams, Till FM Andlauer, Gerome Breen, Enda M Byrne, Toni-Kim Clarke, Andreas J Forstner, Hans J Grabe, Steven P Hamilton, Douglas F Levinson, Cathryn M Lewis, Glyn Lewis, Nicholas G Martin, Yuri Milaneschi, Ole Mors, Bertram Mueller-Myhsok, Brenda WJH Penninx, Roy H Perlis, Giorgio Pistis, James B Potash, Martin Preisig, Jianxin Shi, Jordan W Smoller, Fabien Streit, Henning Tiemeier, Rudolf Uher, Sandra Van der Auwera, Alexander Viktorin, Myrna M Weissman, MDD Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Kenneth S Kendler, Jonathan Flint
发表日期
2020/4
期刊
Nature genetics
卷号
52
期号
4
页码范围
437-447
出版商
Nature Publishing Group US
简介
Minimal phenotyping refers to the reliance on the use of a small number of self-reported items for disease case identification, increasingly used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here we report differences in genetic architecture between depression defined by minimal phenotyping and strictly defined major depressive disorder (MDD): the former has a lower genotype-derived heritability that cannot be explained by inclusion of milder cases and a higher proportion of the genome contributing to this shared genetic liability with other conditions than for strictly defined MDD. GWAS based on minimal phenotyping definitions preferentially identifies loci that are not specific to MDD, and, although it generates highly predictive polygenic risk scores, the predictive power can be explained entirely by large sample sizes rather than by specificity for MDD. Our results show that reliance on results from minimal …
引用总数
201920202021202220232024112864657131