作者
Karin Obermaier, Günther Schmelzeisen-Redeker, Michael Schoemaker, Hans-Martin Klötzer, Harald Kirchsteiger, Heino Eikmeier, Luigi del Re
发表日期
2013/7
期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
卷号
7
期号
4
页码范围
824-832
简介
Background
Even though a Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute proposal exists on the design of studies and performance criteria for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, it has not yet led to a consistent evaluation of different systems, as no consensus has been reached on the reference method to evaluate them or on acceptance levels. As a consequence, performance assessment of CGM systems tends to be inconclusive, and a comparison of the outcome of different studies is difficult.
Materials and Methods
Published information and available data (as presented in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology by Freckmann and coauthors) are used to assess the suitability of several frequently used methods [International Organization for Standardization, continuous glucose error grid analysis, mean absolute relative deviation (MARD), precision absolute relative deviation (PARD …
学术搜索中的文章
K Obermaier, G Schmelzeisen-Redeker… - 2013