作者
Thomas Leclerc, Nicolas Donat, Alexis Donat, Pierre Pasquier, Nicolas Libert, Elodie Schaeffer, Erwan D’Aranda, Jean Cotte, Bruno Fontaine, Pierre-Francois Perrigault, Fabrice Michel, Laurent Muller, Eric Meaudre, Benoit Veber
发表日期
2020/6/1
期刊
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
卷号
39
期号
3
页码范围
333-339
出版商
Elsevier Masson
简介
Background
Relying on capacity increases and patient transfers to deal with the huge and continuous inflow of COVID-19 critically ill patients is a strategy limited by finite human and logistical resources.
Rationale
Prioritising both critical care initiation and continuation is paramount to save the greatest number of lives. It enables to allocate scarce resources in priority to those with the highest probability of benefiting from them. It is fully ethical provided it relies on objective and widely shared criteria, thus preventing arbitrary decisions and guaranteeing equity. Prioritisation seeks to fairly allocate treatments, maximise saved lives, gain indirect life benefits from prioritising exposed healthcare and similar workers, give priority to those most penalised as a last resort, and apply similar prioritisation schemes to all patients.
Prioritisation strategy
Prioritisation schemes and their criteria are adjusted to the level of resource scarcity …
引用总数
20202021202220232024103128194
学术搜索中的文章
T Leclerc, N Donat, A Donat, P Pasquier, N Libert… - Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2020