作者
Susanne Gaube, Harini Suresh, Martina Raue, Eva Lermer, Timo K Koch, Matthias FC Hudecek, Alun D Ackery, Samir C Grover, Joseph F Coughlin, Dieter Frey, Felipe C Kitamura, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Errol Colak
发表日期
2023/1/25
期刊
Scientific reports
卷号
13
期号
1
页码范围
1383
出版商
Nature Publishing Group UK
简介
Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated clinical advice is becoming more prevalent in healthcare. However, the impact of AI-generated advice on physicians’ decision-making is underexplored. In this study, physicians received X-rays with correct diagnostic advice and were asked to make a diagnosis, rate the advice’s quality, and judge their own confidence. We manipulated whether the advice came with or without a visual annotation on the X-rays, and whether it was labeled as coming from an AI or a human radiologist. Overall, receiving annotated advice from an AI resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy. Physicians rated the quality of AI advice higher than human advice. We did not find a strong effect of either manipulation on participants’ confidence. The magnitude of the effects varied between task experts and non-task experts, with the latter benefiting considerably from correct explainable AI advice. These …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章