作者
James E Campbell, Helmut Norpoth, Alan I Abramowitz, Michael S Lewis-Beck, Charles Tien, Robert S Erikson, Christopher Wlezien, Brad Lockerbie, Thomas M Holbrook, Bruno Jerôme, Véronique Jerôme-Speziari, Andreas Graefe, J Scott Armstrong, Randall J Jones, Alfred G Cuzán
发表日期
2017/4
期刊
PS: Political Science & Politics
卷号
50
期号
2
页码范围
331-338
出版商
Cambridge University Press
简介
With one of the wildest, roughest, and nastiest presidential campaigns in modern American history now thankfully behind us and with late vote returns trickling in to a final official count, it is time to take stock of the 2016 election forecasts. 1
The Presidential Forecasts From late June to early September, eight forecasters or teams of forecasters in the PS symposium issued ten presidential election forecasts of the national two-party popular vote (along with the PollyVote composite forecast assembled from an array of different types of forecasts). To avoid any misrepresentation or misunderstanding, it should be emphasized that these forecasts were explicitly of the national two-party popular vote for the major party candidates and not their electoral vote division. 2 The final vote count indicates 65.9 million votes were cast for Clinton and about 63.0 million for Trump, providing Clinton with a 2.9 million national popular vote …
引用总数
2017201820192020202120222023202428578361
学术搜索中的文章
JE Campbell, H Norpoth, AI Abramowitz… - PS: Political Science & Politics, 2017
A Abramowitz, JS Armstrong, JE Campbell, AG Cuzan… - PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2017
A Graefe, JS Armstrong, RJ Jones, AG Cuzán - Forthcoming in PS: Political Science and Politics, 2016