作者
Sander Jacobs, Berta Martín-López, David N Barton, Robert Dunford, Paula A Harrison, Eszter Kelemen, Heli Saarikoski, Mette Termansen, Marina García-Llorente, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Leena Kopperoinen, Sandra Luque, Ignacio Palomo, Joerg A Priess, Graciela M Rusch, Patrizia Tenerelli, Francis Turkelboom, Rolinde Demeyer, Jennifer Hauck, Hans Keune, Ron Smith
发表日期
2018/2/1
期刊
Ecosystem services
卷号
29
页码范围
515-528
出版商
Elsevier
简介
In environmental valuation, although it is well recognised that the choice of method heavily affects the outcome, little is known on how existing valuation methods actually elicit the different values. Through the assessment of real-life applications of valuation of nature, this study tracks down the suitability of 21 valuation methods for 11 value types and assesses the methodological requirements for their operationalization. We found that different valuation methods have different suitabilities to elicit diverse value-types. Some methods are more specialized than others, but every method has blind spots, which implies risks of biased decision-making. We summarized different value-types according to three value dimensions: non-anthropocentric, relational and instrumental. No single valuation method is able to capture this full spectrum of values of nature. Covering all value dimensions requires careful selection of …
引用总数
20172018201920202021202220232024225342525392412
学术搜索中的文章
S Jacobs, B Martín-López, DN Barton, R Dunford… - Ecosystem services, 2018