作者
Ralf Seppelt, Sven Lautenbach, Martin Volk
发表日期
2013/10/1
来源
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
卷号
5
期号
5
页码范围
458-463
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Highlights
- We study methodological gaps of linking global and sub-global research on land management.
- Synthesis of sub-global projects requires embedding results in global scenarios.
- For identification of trade-offs in land management, scenario analysis has limitations.
- Exploratory modelling, namely optimization of land use pattern, supports quantifying functional trade-offs.
- Combining scenario analysis and exploratory modelling at sub-global and global scale offers new opportunities for land system science.
Research on mitigating land use conflicts is characterized by a variety of projects from the global to various sub-global scales. These projects are aiming at disentangling feedbacks within changing socio-environmental systems to identify strategies for sustainable resource use. Our review shows that any global analysis benefits from systematic synthesis of sub-global research from various scales, while sub …
学术搜索中的文章
R Seppelt, S Lautenbach, M Volk - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013