作者
Nima Aghaeepour, Greg Finak, FlowCAP Consortium, Dream Consortium, Holger Hoos, Tim R Mosmann, Ryan Brinkman, Raphael Gottardo, Richard H Scheuermann
发表日期
2013/3
期刊
Nature methods
卷号
10
期号
3
页码范围
228-238
出版商
Nature Publishing Group US
简介
Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods …
引用总数
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024266364936369685061473920
学术搜索中的文章