Playing to the crowd: Agenda control in presidential debates AE Boydstun, RA Glazier, MT Pietryka Political Communication 30 (2), 254-277, 2013 | 67 | 2013 |
Noise, bias, and expertise in political communication networks R Huckfeldt, MT Pietryka, J Reilly Social Networks 36, 110-121, 2014 | 66 | 2014 |
Real-time reactions to a 2012 presidential debate: A method for understanding which messages matter AE Boydstun, RA Glazier, MT Pietryka, P Resnik Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (S1), 330-343, 2014 | 60 | 2014 |
An analysis of ANES items and their use in the construction of political knowledge scales MT Pietryka, RC MacIntosh Political Analysis 21 (4), 407-429, 2013 | 44 | 2013 |
It's Not Just What You Have, but Who You Know: Networks, Social Proximity to Elites, and Voting in State and Local Elections MT Pietryka, DA DeBats American Political Science Review 111 (2), 360-378, 2017 | 34 | 2017 |
Networks, interdependence, and social influence in politics R Huckfeldt, JJ Mondak, M Hayes, MT Pietryka, J Reilly | 26 | 2013 |
Accuracy motivations, predispositions, and social information in political discussion networks MT Pietryka Political Psychology 37 (3), 367-386, 2016 | 23 | 2016 |
ANES Scales Often Do Not Measure What You Think They Measure MT Pietryka, RC MacIntosh Journal of Politics, 2022 | 19* | 2022 |
Colleague Crowdsourcing: A Method for Fostering National Student Engagement and Large-N Data Collection AE Boydstun, RA Glazier, JT Feezell, T Jurka, M Pietryka PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (4), 829-834, 2014 | 19 | 2014 |
From respondents to networks: Bridging between individuals, discussants, and the network in the study of political discussion MT Pietryka, JL Reilly, DM Maliniak, PR Miller, R Huckfeldt, RB Rapoport Political Behavior 40, 711-735, 2018 | 17 | 2018 |
Going maverick: How candidates can use agenda-setting to influence citizen motivations and offset unpopular issue positions MT Pietryka, AE Boydstun Political Behavior 34, 737-763, 2012 | 15 | 2012 |
The roles of district and national opinion in 2010 congressional campaign agendas MT Pietryka American Politics Research 40 (5), 805-843, 2012 | 9 | 2012 |
Learning through collaborative data projects: Engaging students and building rapport MT Pietryka, RA Glazier Education Sciences 12 (12), 897, 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
Party, constituency, and representation in congress WJ Stone, MT Pietryka The State of the Parties, 6th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 333-347, 2010 | 4 | 2010 |
Scalable multidimensional response measurement using a mobile platform P Resnik, AE Boydstun, RA Glazier, MT Pietryka Political Communication in Real Time, 171-196, 2016 | 3 | 2016 |
Examining debate effects in real time: A report of the 2012 React Labs: Educate study A Boydstun, R Glazier, T Jurka, M Pietryka The Political Communication Report 23 (1), 2013 | 3 | 2013 |
Sponsorship effects in online surveys C Crabtree, HL Kern, MT Pietryka Political Behavior, 2020 | 2 | 2020 |
Networks, contexts, and the process of political influence R Huckfeldt, MT Pietryka, JB Ryan The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behaviorand Public Opinion, 267-279, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
Constitutional Innovation and Imitation in the American States EJ Engstrom, MT Pietryka, JT Scott Political Research Quarterly 75 (1), 244-258, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
Examining Motivations in Interpersonal Communication Experiments EC Connors, MT Pietryka, JB Ryan Elements in Experimental Political Science, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |