| Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers P Conway, J Goldstein-Greenwood, D Polacek, JD Greene Cognition 179, 241-265, 2018 | 216 | 2018 |
| (How) do you regret killing one to save five? Affective and cognitive regret differ after utilitarian and deontological decisions J Goldstein-Greenwood, P Conway, A Summerville, BN Johnson Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 46 (9), 1303-1317, 2020 | 18 | 2020 |
| Multilevel modeling resolves ambiguities in analyses of discipline disproportionality: A demonstration comparing Title 1 Montessori and non-Montessori schools L LeBoeuf, J Goldstein-Greenwood, AS Lillard Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 17 (2), 365-390, 2024 | 3 | 2024 |
| Rates of chronic absenteeism in Montessori and non-Montessori Title 1 schools L LeBoeuf, J Goldstein-Greenwood, AS Lillard Frontiers in Education 8, 1059071, 2023 | 3 | 2023 |
| Fatigue compatibilism: lay perceivers believe that fatigue predicts—but does not excuse—moral failings J Goldstein-Greenwood, P Conway Social Cognition 37 (1), 57-S16, 2019 | 1 | 2019 |
| Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Sacrificial Dilemma Decisions J Goldstein-Greenwood | | 2019 |
| (How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Sacrificial Dilemma Decisions J Goldstein-Greenwood | | 2019 |
| Sacrificing One to Save the Many: Compassionate or Cold-Blooded? J Goldstein-Greenwood, P Conway | | 2016 |
