| The domestic effectiveness of international human rights monitoring in established democracies. The case of the UN human rights treaty bodies J Krommendijk The Review of International Organizations 10 (4), 489-512, 2015 | 69 | 2015 |
| ‘Proportional’by what measure (s)? Balancing investor interests and human rights by way of applying the proportionality principle in investor-state arbitration J Krommendijk, J Morijn Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Oxford: Oxford …, 2009 | 59 | 2009 |
| Is there light on the horizon? The distinction between “Rewe effectiveness” and the principle of effective judicial protection in Article 47 of the Charter after Orizzonte J Krommendijk Common Market Law Review 53 (5), 2016 | 42 | 2016 |
| The domestic impact and effectiveness of the process of state reporting under UN human rights treaties in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland: Paper-pushing or policy … J Krommendijk | 42 | 2014 |
| The use of ECtHR case law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon: the view of Luxembourg Insiders J Krommendijk Maastricht journal of European and comparative law 22 (6), 812-835, 2015 | 36 | 2015 |
| From Opinion 2/13 to Avotiņš: Recent Developments in the Relationship between the Luxembourg and Strasbourg Courts LR Glas, J Krommendijk Human Rights Law Review 17 (3), 567-587, 2017 | 29 | 2017 |
| Principled silence or mere silence on principles? The role of the EU charter’s principles in the case law of the court of justice J Krommendijk European Constitutional Law Review 11 (2), 321-356, 2015 | 26 | 2015 |
| The highest Dutch courts and the preliminary ruling procedure: Critically obedient interlocutors of the Court of Justice J Krommendijk European Law Journal 25 (4), 394-415, 2019 | 23 | 2019 |
| The (in) effectiveness of UN human rights treaty body recommendations J Krommendijk Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 33 (2), 194-223, 2015 | 21 | 2015 |
| National courts and preliminary references to the Court of Justice J Krommendijk Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021 | 20 | 2021 |
| 'Open Sesame!': Improving Access to the ECJ by Obliging National Courts to Reason Their Refusals to Refer J Krommendijk Forthcoming in European Law Review, 2017 | 14 | 2017 |
| The Use of ECtHR Case Law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon: The View of Luxembourg Insiders’(2015) J Krommendijk Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 22, 812, 0 | 14 | |
| The (In) Effectiveness of UN Human Rights Treaty Body Recommendations’(2015) J Krommendijk Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 33, 194, 0 | 13 | |
| From Opinion 2/13 to Avotiņš: Recent Developments in the Relationship between the Luxembourg and Strasbourg Court’(2017) LR Glas, J Krommendijk Human Rights Law Review 17, 567, 0 | 13 | |
| Wide Open and Unguarded Stand our Gates: The CJEU and References for a Preliminary Ruling in Purely Internal Situations J Krommendijk German Law Journal 18 (6), 1359-1394, 2017 | 12 | 2017 |
| Finnish exceptionalism at play? The effectiveness of the recommendations of UN human rights treaty bodies in Finland J Krommendijk Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (1), 18-43, 2014 | 12 | 2014 |
| Beyond Urgenda: The role of the ECHR and judgments of the ECtHR in Dutch environmental and climate litigation J Krommendijk Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 31 (1), 60-74, 2022 | 11 | 2022 |
| Less is more: proposals for how UN human rights treaty bodies can be more selective J Krommendijk Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 38 (1), 5-11, 2020 | 10 | 2020 |
| The preliminary reference dance between the CJEU and Dutch courts in the field of migration J Krommendijk Eur. J. Legal Stud. 10, 101, 2017 | 8 | 2017 |
| To intervene or not to intervene: intervention before the court of justice of the european union in environmental and migration law J Krommendijk, K Van der Pas The International Journal of Human Rights 26 (8), 1394-1417, 2022 | 7 | 2022 |
