Distraction in diagnostic radiology: how is search through volumetric medical images affected by interruptions? LH Williams, T Drew Cognitive research: principles and implications 2 (1), 12, 2017 | 62 | 2017 |
What do we know about volumetric medical image interpretation?: a review of the basic science and medical image perception literatures LH Williams, T Drew Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 4 (1), 21, 2019 | 54 | 2019 |
Simple eye-movement feedback during visual search is not helpful T Drew, LH Williams Cognitive research: principles and implications 2 (1), 44, 2017 | 30 | 2017 |
The invisible breast cancer: Experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology L Williams, A Carrigan, W Auffermann, M Mills, A Rich, J Elmore, T Drew Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-9, 2020 | 28 | 2020 |
Quantifying the costs of interruption during diagnostic radiology interpretation using mobile eye-tracking glasses T Drew, LH Williams, B Aldred, ME Heilbrun, S Minoshima Journal of Medical Imaging 5 (3), 031406, 2018 | 22 | 2018 |
Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity LH Williams, T Drew Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-18, 2020 | 14 | 2020 |
Neural Processing of Repeated Search Targets Depends Upon the Stimuli: Real World Stimuli Engage Semantic Processing and Recognition Memory T Drew, LH Williams, CM Jones, R Luria Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12, 2018 | 12 | 2018 |
Working memory capacity predicts search accuracy for novel as well as repeated targets LH Williams, T Drew Visual Cognition 26 (6), 463-474, 2018 | 10 | 2018 |
Characteristics of expert search behavior in volumetric medical image interpretation LH Williams, AJ Carrigan, M Mills, WF Auffermann, AN Rich, T Drew Journal of Medical Imaging 8 (4), 041208, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
Electrophysiological correlates of individual differences in visual search L Williams, T Drew Journal of Vision 17 (10), 1140-1140, 2017 | 4 | 2017 |
What is the role of working memory in hybrid search?: Evidence from the Contralateral Delay Activity L Williams, I Wiegand, M Lavelle, J Wolfe, K Fukuda, T Drew Journal of Vision 20 (11), 261-261, 2020 | 2 | 2020 |
Perception of volumetric data GD Rubin, T Drew, LH Williams The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques 2, 307-327, 2018 | 2 | 2018 |
How do you know if you saw that? Electrophysiological correlates of searching through memory. T Drew, LH Williams, JM Wolfe, I Wiegand Journal of Vision 19 (10), 317a-317a, 2019 | 1 | 2019 |
Hybrid search performance is better for target sets with greater memory strength V Stoermer, L Williams, T Brady Journal of Vision 22 (14), 3805-3805, 2022 | | 2022 |
Category labels do not improve working memory performance for ambiguous shapes L Williams, T Brady, V Störmer Journal of Vision 21 (9), 2778-2778, 2021 | | 2021 |
Investigating the costs of interruptions on visual search performance D Alonso, A Tasevac, L Williams, T Drew Journal of Vision 20 (11), 772-772, 2020 | | 2020 |
Attentional deployment during visual search predicts subsequent long-term memory of real world objects ME Lavelle, K Cornelison, LH Williams, T Drew Journal of Vision 20 (11), 295-295, 2020 | | 2020 |
Does this grab your attention? A comparison of attention and memory resources deployed during search for artificial and real world objects. C Jones, L Williams, T Drew Journal of Vision 18 (10), 521-521, 2018 | | 2018 |
Are rejected distractors maintained in working memory? Evidence from the Contralateral Delay Activity L Williams, T Drew Journal of Vision 18 (10), 526-526, 2018 | | 2018 |
Lost in Space: The Cost of Interruption During Search Through Volumetric Medical Images L Williams, T Drew Journal of Vision 16 (12), 1332-1332, 2016 | | 2016 |