| What is art good for? The socio-epistemic value of art A Sherman, C Morrissey Frontiers in human neuroscience 11, 411, 2017 | 70 | 2017 |
| Bioethics methods in the ethical, legal, and social implications of the human genome project literature RL Walker, C Morrissey Bioethics 28 (9), 481-490, 2014 | 25 | 2014 |
| The ethics of general population preventive genomic sequencing: rights and social justice C Morrissey, RL Walker The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy …, 2018 | 23 | 2018 |
| Charting ELSI’s future course: lessons from the recent past RL Walker, C Morrissey Genetics in medicine 14 (2), 259-267, 2012 | 18 | 2012 |
| Funding and forums for ELSI research: who (or what) is setting the agenda? C Morrissey, RL Walker AJOB primary research 3 (3), 51-60, 2012 | 13 | 2012 |
| The value of dignity in and for bioethics: rethinking the terms of the debate C Morrissey Theoretical medicine and bioethics 37 (3), 173-192, 2016 | 7 | 2016 |
| Engaging reading C Morrissey, K Palghat Teaching Philosophy 37 (1), 37-55, 2014 | 7 | 2014 |
| Response to: Commentary: What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art A Sherman, C Morrissey Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12, 237, 2018 | 1 | 2018 |
| Philosophy in the Rainforest: Reflections on Integrating Philosophy and Fieldwork C Morrissey Building Inclusive Ethical Cultures in STEM, 331-345, 2024 | | 2024 |
| Nonideal theory, self-respect, and preimplantation genetic technologies C Morrissey, E Neale Human Embryos and Preimplantation Genetic Technologies, 67-74, 2019 | | 2019 |
| Grounding the standing to prosecute atrocities C Morrissey The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2010 | | 2010 |
| A role for expression in retributive theories of punishment C Morrissey The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2006 | | 2006 |
