Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population T Perko Journal of environmental radioactivity 133, 86-91, 2014 | 143 | 2014 |
Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accident T Perko Integrated environmental assessment and management 7 (3), 388-392, 2011 | 78 | 2011 |
Information sources as explanatory variables for the Belgian health‐related risk perception of the Fukushima nuclear accident B Vyncke, T Perko, B Van Gorp Risk Analysis 37 (3), 570-582, 2017 | 63 | 2017 |
Communication in nuclear emergency preparedness: a closer look at information reception T Perko, B van Gorp, C Turcanu, P Thijssen, B Carle Risk Analysis 33 (11), 1987-2001, 2013 | 61 | 2013 |
Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries T Perko, N Železnik, C Turcanu, P Thijssen Health Physics 102 (6), 614-625, 2012 | 48 | 2012 |
Public opinion change after the Fukushima nuclear accident: the role of national context revisited E Latré, T Perko, P Thijssen Energy Policy 104, 124-133, 2017 | 41 | 2017 |
Media reporting of nuclear emergencies: the effects of transparent communication in a minor nuclear event T Perko, C Turcanu, B Carlé Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 20 (1), 52-63, 2012 | 40 | 2012 |
Media reporting and changes in public opinion after Fukushima nuclear accident: Belgium as case study T Perko, C Turcanu, D Geenen International journal of nuclear governance, economy and ecology 3 (4), 291-307, 2012 | 34 | 2012 |
Insights into the reception and acceptance of risk messages: nuclear emergency communication T Perko, P Thijssen, C Turcanu, B Van Gorp Journal of Risk Research 17 (9), 1207-1232, 2014 | 32 | 2014 |
Public participation processes related to nuclear research installations: What are the driving factors behind participation intention? C Turcanu, T Perko, E Laes Public Understanding of Science 23 (3), 331-347, 2014 | 30 | 2014 |
How did media present the radiation risks after the Fukushima accident: a content analysis of newspapers in Europe Y Tomkiv, T Perko, DH Oughton, I Prezelj, MC Cantone, E Gallego Journal of Radiological Protection 36 (2), S64, 2016 | 28 | 2016 |
Who is willing to participate? Examining public participation intention concerning decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Belgium F Hoti, T Perko, P Thijssen, O Renn Energy Policy 157, 112488, 2021 | 27 | 2021 |
The party politics of nuclear energy: Party cues and public opinion regarding nuclear energy in Belgium E Latré, P Thijssen, T Perko Energy Research & Social Science 47, 192-201, 2019 | 27 | 2019 |
The SCK-CEN Barometer 2011-Perception and attitudes towards nuclear technologies in the Belgian population C Turcanu, T Perko, J Schröder | 26* | 2011 |
The Potsdam radon communication manifesto F Bouder, T Perko, R Lofstedt, O Renn, C Rossmann, D Hevey, M Siegrist, ... Journal of Risk Research 24 (7), 909-912, 2021 | 25 | 2021 |
Does it matter who communicates? The effect of source labels in nuclear pre‐crisis communication in televised news E Latré, T Perko, P Thijssen Journal of contingencies and crisis management 26 (1), 99-112, 2018 | 24 | 2018 |
Risk communication in the case of the Fukushima accident: impact of communication and lessons to be learned T Perko Integrated environmental assessment and management 12 (4), 683-686, 2016 | 24 | 2016 |
Is internet a missed opportunity? Evaluating radon websites from a stakeholder engagement perspective T Perko, C Turcanu Journal of environmental radioactivity 212, 106123, 2020 | 23 | 2020 |
Evaluation of citizen science contributions to radon research M Martell, T Perko, Y Tomkiv, S Long, A Dowdall, J Kenens Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 237, 106685, 2021 | 22 | 2021 |
The limits of public communication coordination in a nuclear emergency: lessons from media reporting on the Fukushima case I Prezelj, T Perko, MC Cantone, E Gallego, Y Tomkiv, DH Oughton Journal of Radiological Protection 36 (2), S45, 2016 | 22 | 2016 |