The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students J Bitchener, U Knoch Language teaching research 12 (3), 409-431, 2008 | 922 | 2008 |
The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation J Bitchener, U Knoch Applied linguistics 31 (2), 193-214, 2010 | 860 | 2010 |
Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback J Bitchener, U Knoch Journal of second language writing 19 (4), 207-217, 2010 | 806 | 2010 |
The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback J Bitchener, U Knoch System 37 (2), 322-329, 2009 | 492 | 2009 |
The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback J Bitchener, U Knoch ELT journal 63 (3), 204-211, 2009 | 485 | 2009 |
Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales U Knoch Language Testing 26 (2), 275-304, 2009 | 336 | 2009 |
Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? U Knoch Assessing Writing 16 (2), 81-96, 2011 | 216 | 2011 |
Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training? U Knoch, J Read, J von Randow Assessing writing 12 (1), 26-43, 2007 | 210 | 2007 |
Diagnostic writing assessment: The development and validation of a rating scale U Knoch Peter Lang, 2009 | 194 | 2009 |
Fairness, justice and language assessment T McNamara, U Knoch Oxford University Press, 2019 | 189 | 2019 |
Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment C Elder, G Barkhuizen, U Knoch, J Von Randow Language Testing 24 (1), 37-64, 2007 | 177 | 2007 |
What happens to ESL students’ writing after three years of study at an English medium university? U Knoch, A Rouhshad, SP Oon, N Storch Journal of Second Language Writing 28, 39-52, 2015 | 167 | 2015 |
Individual feedback to enhance rater training: Does it work? C Elder, U Knoch, G Barkhuizen, J Von Randow Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal 2 (3), 175-196, 2005 | 160 | 2005 |
A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes U Knoch, W Sitajalabhorn Assessing writing 18 (4), 300-308, 2013 | 143 | 2013 |
The Rasch wars: The emergence of Rasch measurement in language testing T McNamara, U Knoch Language Testing 29 (4), 555-576, 2012 | 139 | 2012 |
Validation of rating processes within an argument-based framework U Knoch, CA Chapelle Language Testing 35 (4), 477-499, 2018 | 130 | 2018 |
Investigating the effectiveness of individualized feedback to rating behavior—a longitudinal study U Knoch Language Testing 28 (2), 179-200, 2011 | 126 | 2011 |
Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university? U Knoch, A Rouhshad, N Storch Assessing Writing 21, 1-17, 2014 | 125 | 2014 |
A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials J Hughson, R Woodward-Kron, A Parker, J Hajek, A Bresin, U Knoch, ... Trials 17, 1-10, 2016 | 119 | 2016 |
‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence U Knoch Assessing writing 12 (2), 108-128, 2007 | 99 | 2007 |