3D magnetotelluric modeling by using finite-difference method: Comparison study of different forward modeling approaches D Varilsuha, ME Candansayar Geophysics 83 (2), WB51-WB60, 2018 | 36 | 2018 |
3D inversion of magnetotelluric data by using a hybrid forward-modeling approach and mesh decoupling D Varılsüha Geophysics 85 (5), E191-E205, 2020 | 17 | 2020 |
A novel hybrid finite element–Finite difference approach for 3D Magnetotelluric modeling D Varılsüha Computers & Geosciences 188, 105614, 2024 | | 2024 |
Sonlu farklar ve sonlu elemanlar melez düz çözümü i̇le mt verilerinin hizli 3B ters çözümü D Varilsüha PQDT-Global, 2019 | | 2019 |
A Hybrid Finite Difference Finite Element Approach for 3D Magnetotelluric Forward Modeling D Varilsuha 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018 2018 (1), 1-5, 2018 | | 2018 |
Comparison Study Of Different Formulations Used In 3D Magnetotelluric Modeling D Varilsuha, ME Candansayar 9th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society 2017 (1), 1-5, 2017 | | 2017 |
İlk Varış Zamanlarından Sismik Ortama Ait İstatistiksel Parametrelerin Kestirilmesi D Varılsüha Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2015 | | 2015 |
The analysis of topography and distortion effects in real data: A Case Study on 3D inversion of MT data from the Northeast Carpathian Volcanic Arc M Neukirch, D Varılsüha, A Minakov, M Smirnov | | |
on 3D Inversion of MT Data from the Northeast Carpathian Volcanic Arc M Neukirch, D Varılsüha, A Minakov, M Smirnov | | |
Speeding up the inversion of the 3D MT problem D Varılsüha | | |