COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making W Van Lancker, Z Parolin The Lancet Public Health 5 (5), e243-e244, 2020 | 1908 | 2020 |
Three shortcomings of the social investment perspective B Cantillon, W Van Lancker Social Policy and Society 12 (4), 553-564, 2013 | 250 | 2013 |
The Matthew effect in childcare use: a matter of policies or preferences? E Pavolini, W Van Lancker Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6), 878-893, 2018 | 231 | 2018 |
Who benefits? The social distribution of subsidized childcare in Sweden and Flanders WV Lancker, J Ghysels Acta Sociologica 55 (2), 125-142, 2012 | 203* | 2012 |
The unequal benefits of activation: an analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children J Ghysels, W Van Lancker Journal of European Social Policy 21 (5), 472-485, 2011 | 179 | 2011 |
Putting the Child-Centred Investment Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU27 W Van Lancker European Journal of Social Security 15 (1), 4-27, 2013 | 178 | 2013 |
The impact of child benefits on single mother poverty: Exploring the role of targeting in 15 European countries W Van Lancker, J Ghysels, B Cantillon International Journal of Social Welfare 24 (3), 210-222, 2015 | 147* | 2015 |
Universalism under siege? Exploring the association between targeting, child benefits and child poverty across 26 countries W Van Lancker, N Van Mechelen Social science research 50, 60-75, 2015 | 147 | 2015 |
Social Investment and the Matthew effect G Bonoli, B Cantillon, W Van Lancker The uses of social investment, 66-76, 2017 | 141 | 2017 |
Explaining patterns of inequality in childcare service use across 31 developed economies: A welfare state perspective W Van Lancker, J Ghysels International Journal of Comparative Sociology 57 (5), 310-337, 2016 | 114 | 2016 |
The European world of temporary employment WV Lancker European Societies 14 (1), 83-111, 2012 | 104* | 2012 |
Reducing Inequality in Childcare Service Use across European Countries: What (if any) Is the role of Social Spending? W Van Lancker Social Policy & Administration 52 (1), 271-292, 2018 | 91 | 2018 |
Solidarity and reciprocity in the social investment state: what can be learned from the case of Flemish school allowances and truancy? B Cantillon, W Van Lancker Journal of social policy 41 (04), 657-675, 2012 | 50 | 2012 |
Trends in Women’s Employment and Poverty Rates in OECD Countries: A Kitagawa–Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition R Nieuwenhuis, W Van Lancker, D Collado, B Cantillon Italian Economic Journal 6 (1), 37-61, 2020 | 42* | 2020 |
Non‐take up of the supplemental child benefit for children with a disability in Belgium: A mixed‐method approach J Vinck, J Lebeer, W Van Lancker Social Policy & Administration 53 (3), 357-384, 2019 | 37 | 2019 |
Het Matteüseffect onder de loep: over het ongelijke gebruik van kinderopvang in Vlaanderen J Ghysels, W Van Lancker UA/Berichten, 2009 | 37 | 2009 |
The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy R Nieuwenhuis, W Van Lancker Springer Nature, 2020 | 35 | 2020 |
Family policies’ long-term effects on poverty: a comparative analysis of single and partnered mothers H Zagel, W Van Lancker Journal of European Social Policy 32 (2), 166-181, 2022 | 32 | 2022 |
To whose benefit? An empirical and comparative investigation into the (un)intended consequences of family policy in the social investment state WIM VAN LANCKER University of Antwerp, Department of Sociology, 2014 | 32* | 2014 |
What a social investment ‘litmus test’must address: A response to Plavgo and Hemerijck Z Parolin, W Van Lancker Journal of European Social Policy 31 (3), 297-308, 2021 | 30 | 2021 |