Customary Law Without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation N Petersen Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 23, 275, 2007 | 197 | 2007 |
Proportionality and judicial activism: fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa N Petersen Cambridge University Press, 2017 | 105 | 2017 |
Ökonomische Methoden im Recht: Eine Einführung für Juristen EV Towfigh, N Petersen | 104 | 2023 |
Antitrust law and the promotion of democracy and economic growth N Petersen Journal of competition law and economics 9 (3), 593-636, 2013 | 84 | 2013 |
Braucht die Rechtswissenschaft eine empirische Wende? N Petersen Der Staat, 435-455, 2010 | 81 | 2010 |
Demokratie als teleologisches Prinzip: zur Legitimität von Staatsgewalt im Völkerrecht N Petersen Springer Science & Business Media, 2009 | 79 | 2009 |
Verhältnismäßigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle: eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsgerichtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten N Petersen Mohr Siebeck, 2015 | 76 | 2015 |
Avoiding the common-wisdom fallacy: The role of social sciences in constitutional adjudication N Petersen International Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2), 294-318, 2013 | 69 | 2013 |
How to compare the length of lines to the weight of stones: Balancing and the resolution of value conflicts in constitutional law N Petersen German Law Journal 14 (8), 1387-1408, 2013 | 65 | 2013 |
The International Court of Justice and the judicial politics of identifying customary international law N Petersen European Journal of International Law 28 (2), 357-385, 2017 | 62 | 2017 |
The Principle of Democratic Teleology in International Law N Petersen Brook. J. Int'l L. 34, 33, 2008 | 58 | 2008 |
Demokratie und Grundgesetz: Veränderungen des Demokratieprinzips in Art. 20 Abs. 2 GG angesichts der Herausforderungen moderner Staatlichkeit N Petersen Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, 2008 | 43 | 2008 |
How Rational is International Law? N Petersen European Journal of International Law 20 (4), 1247-1262, 2009 | 34 | 2009 |
The German constitutional court and legislative capture N Petersen International Journal of Constitutional Law 12 (3), 650-669, 2014 | 30 | 2014 |
Human dignity, international protection N Petersen Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 1-9, 2012 | 28 | 2012 |
Lawmaking by the International Court of Justice—Factors of Success N Petersen German Law Journal 12 (5), 1295-1316, 2011 | 28 | 2011 |
Alexy and the “German” model of proportionality: why the theory of constitutional rights does not provide a representative reconstruction of the proportionality test N Petersen German Law Journal 21 (2), 163-173, 2020 | 27 | 2020 |
The role of consent and uncertainty in the formation of customary international law N Petersen Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, 2011 | 27 | 2011 |
Karlsruhe’s Lochner moment? A rational choice perspective on the German federal constitutional court’s relationship to the CJEU after the PSPP decision N Petersen German Law Journal 21 (5), 995-1005, 2020 | 26 | 2020 |
Karlsruhe not only barks, but finally bites—some remarks on the OMT decision of the German constitutional court N Petersen German Law Journal 15 (2), 321-327, 2014 | 26 | 2014 |