| A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring DM Williamson, X Xi, FJ Breyer Educational measurement: issues and practice 31 (1), 2-13, 2012 | 416 | 2012 |
| Automatic scoring of non-native spontaneous speech in tests of spoken English K Zechner, D Higgins, X Xi, DM Williamson Speech communication 51 (10), 883-895, 2009 | 361 | 2009 |
| How do we go about investigating test fairness? X Xi Language testing 27 (2), 147-170, 2010 | 310 | 2010 |
| Automated scoring and feedback systems: Where are we and where are we heading? X Xi Language Testing 27 (3), 291-300, 2010 | 183 | 2010 |
| A three-stage approach to the automated scoring of spontaneous spoken responses D Higgins, X Xi, K Zechner, D Williamson Computer Speech & Language 25 (2), 282-306, 2011 | 149 | 2011 |
| Methods of test validation X Xi, Y Sawaki Encyclopedia of language and education 7, 177-96, 2008 | 139 | 2008 |
| Automated scoring of spontaneous speech using SpeechRater v1.0 DM Xi, X., Higgins, D., Zechner, K., & Williamson ETS Research Rep., 2008 | 119* | 2008 |
| Evaluating analytic scoring for the TOEFL® Academic Speaking Test (TAST) for operational use X Xi Language Testing 24 (2), 251-286, 2007 | 106 | 2007 |
| Using raters from India to score a large‐scale speaking test X Xi, P Mollaun Language Learning 61 (4), 1222-1255, 2011 | 84 | 2011 |
| How do raters from India perform in scoring the TOEFL iBT Speaking section and what kind of training helps? P Xi, X., & Mollaun TOEFL iBT Research Rep., 2009 | 70* | 2009 |
| Improved pronunciation features for construct-driven assessment of non-native spontaneous speech L Chen, K Zechner, X Xi Proceedings of human language technologies: The 2009 annual conference of …, 2009 | 69 | 2009 |
| A comparison of two scoring methods for an automated speech scoring system X Xi, D Higgins, K Zechner, D Williamson Language Testing 29 (3), 371-394, 2012 | 66 | 2012 |
| Investigating the utility of analytic scoring for the TOEFL Academic Speaking Test (TAST) P Xi, X., & Mollaun TOEFL iBT Research Report, 2006 | 65* | 2006 |
| Do visual chunks and planning impact performance on the graph description task in the SPEAK exam? X Xi Language Testing 22 (4), 463-508, 2005 | 65 | 2005 |
| SpeechRater: A construct-driven approach to scoring spontaneous non-native speech K Zechner, D Higgins, X Xi Proc. SLaTE, 2007 | 58 | 2007 |
| A study on the impact of fatigue on human raters when scoring speaking responses G Ling, P Mollaun, X Xi Language Testing 31 (4), 479-499, 2014 | 55 | 2014 |
| Aspects of performance on line graph description tasks: Influenced by graph familiarity and different task features X Xi Language Testing 27 (1), 73-100, 2010 | 49 | 2010 |
| Validating TOEFL® iBT Speaking and setting score requirements for ITA screening X Xi Language Assessment Quarterly 4 (4), 318-351, 2007 | 45 | 2007 |
| Validity and the automated scoring of performance tests X Xi The Routledge handbook of language testing, 513-529, 2021 | 36 | 2021 |
| What does corpus linguistics have to offer to language assessment? X Xi Language Testing 34 (4), 565-577, 2017 | 36 | 2017 |
Klaus ZechnerEducational Testing Service在 ets.org 的电子邮件经过验证
