Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis S Steegen, F Tuerlinckx, A Gelman, W Vanpaemel Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5), 702-712, 2016 | 1148 | 2016 |
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network H Moshontz, L Campbell, CR Ebersole, H IJzerman, HL Urry, PS Forscher, ... Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4), 501-515, 2018 | 416 | 2018 |
A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings EP LeBel, R McCarthy, BD Earp, M Elson, W Vanpaemel Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (3), 389-402, 2018 | 303 | 2018 |
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review RD Morey, CD Chambers, PJ Etchells, CR Harris, R Hoekstra, D Lakens, ... Royal Society open science 3 (1), 150547, 2016 | 264 | 2016 |
Assessing temporal emotion dynamics using networks LF Bringmann, ML Pe, N Vissers, E Ceulemans, D Borsboom, ... Assessment 23 (4), 425-435, 2016 | 259 | 2016 |
A practical guide for transparency in psychological science O Klein, TE Hardwicke, F Aust, J Breuer, H Danielsson, AH Mohr, ... Collabra: Psychology 4, 20, 2018 | 234 | 2018 |
In search of abstraction: The varying abstraction model of categorization W Vanpaemel, G Storms Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (4), 732-749, 2008 | 194 | 2008 |
Prior sensitivity in theory testing: An apologia for the Bayes factor W Vanpaemel Journal of Mathematical Psychology 54 (6), 491-498, 2010 | 189 | 2010 |
To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply? B Jones, LM DeBruine, JK Flake, MT Liuzza, J Antfolk, NC Arinze, ... Nature Human Behaviour, 159–169, 2021 | 184 | 2021 |
Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts S De Deyne, S Verheyen, E Ameel, W Vanpaemel, MJ Dry, W Voorspoels, ... Behavior research methods 40, 1030-1048, 2008 | 166 | 2008 |
Are we wasting a good crisis? The availability of psychological research data after the storm W Vanpaemel, M Vermorgen, L Deriemaecker, G Storms Collabra 1 (1), 3, 2015 | 162 | 2015 |
Comparing dream to reality: An assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies A Claesen, S Gomes, F Tuerlinckx, W Vanpaemel Royal Society open science 8 (10), 211037, 2021 | 153* | 2021 |
Bayesian estimation in hierarchical models JK Kruschke, W Vanpaemel The Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology, 279-299, 2015 | 153 | 2015 |
A brief guide to evaluate replications EP LeBel, W Vanpaemel, I Cheung, L Campbell Meta-Psychology 3, 2019 | 146 | 2019 |
Determining informative priors for cognitive models M Lee, W Vanpaemel Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25, 114–127, 2018 | 127 | 2018 |
Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars W Ruts, S De Deyne, E Ameel, W Vanpaemel, T Verbeemen, G Storms Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36 (3), 506-515, 2004 | 118 | 2004 |
Registered replication report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008) B Verschuere, EH Meijer, A Jim, K Hoogesteyn, R Orthey, RJ McCarthy, ... Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (3), 299-317, 2018 | 116 | 2018 |
A Bayesian hierarchical mixture approach to individual differences: Case studies in selective attention and representation in category learning A Bartlema, M Lee, R Wetzels, W Vanpaemel Journal of Mathematical Psychology 59, 132-150, 2014 | 107 | 2014 |
Using priors to formalize theory: Optimal attention and the generalized context model W Vanpaemel, MD Lee Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19 (6), 1047-1056, 2012 | 105 | 2012 |
Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability CR Ebersole, BA Nosek, MC Kidwell, N Buttrick, E Baranski, J Hartshorne Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 309–331, 2020 | 97 | 2020 |