Handbook of argumentation theory JHM van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E.C.W., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F ... Dordrecht: Springer, 2014 | 1348* | 2014 |
Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages B Verheij Proc. NAIC 96, 357-368, 1996 | 313 | 1996 |
A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence Z Akata, D Balliet, M De Rijke, F Dignum, V Dignum, G Eiben, A Fokkens, ... Computer 53 (8), 18-28, 2020 | 310 | 2020 |
Rules, reasons, arguments: formal studies of argumentation and defeat B Verheij Formal studies of argumentation and defeat, Doctorial dissetation …, 1996 | 239 | 1996 |
Rules, Reasons, Arguments: formal studies of argumentation and defeat B Verheij Universiteit Maastricht, 1996 | 239 | 1996 |
Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme B Verheij Argumentation 19, 347-371, 2005 | 237 | 2005 |
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law T Bench-Capon, M Araszkiewicz, K Ashley, K Atkinson, F Bex, F Borges, ... Artificial Intelligence and Law 20, 215-319, 2012 | 223 | 2012 |
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic B Verheij Artificial intelligence and Law 11 (2), 167-195, 2003 | 220 | 2003 |
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation B Verheij Artificial intelligence 150 (1-2), 291-324, 2003 | 206 | 2003 |
Deflog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions B Verheij Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (3), 319-346, 2003 | 193 | 2003 |
A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence FJ Bex, PJ Van Koppen, H Prakken, B Verheij Artificial Intelligence and Law 18, 123-152, 2010 | 172 | 2010 |
Arguing on the Toulmin model D Hitchcock, B Verheij Arguing on the Toulmin Model 10, 2006 | 166 | 2006 |
Virtual arguments: on the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers B Verheij TMC Asser Press, 2005 | 135 | 2005 |
How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study H De Weerd, R Verbrugge, B Verheij Artificial Intelligence 199, 67-92, 2013 | 128 | 2013 |
Automated argument assistance for lawyers B Verheij Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial intelligence …, 1999 | 112 | 1999 |
A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios CS Vlek, H Prakken, S Renooij, B Verheij Artificial Intelligence and Law 24, 285-324, 2016 | 90 | 2016 |
Negotiating with other minds: the role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information H De Weerd, R Verbrugge, B Verheij Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 31, 250-287, 2017 | 88 | 2017 |
Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning B Verheij, F Bex, ST Timmer, CS Vlek, JJC Meyer, S Renooij, H Prakken Law, Probability and Risk 15 (1), 35-70, 2016 | 86 | 2016 |
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks ST Timmer, JJC Meyer, H Prakken, S Renooij, B Verheij International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 80, 475-494, 2017 | 85 | 2017 |
An integrated view on rules and principles B Verheij, JC Hage, HJ Van Den Herik Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 3-26, 1998 | 84 | 1998 |