受强制性开放获取政策约束的文章 - Monika Glavina了解详情
可在其他位置公开访问的文章：16 篇
What drives compliance with COVID‐19 measures over time? Explaining changing impacts with goal framing theory
F Six, S De Vadder, M Glavina, K Verhoest, K Pepermans
Regulation & Governance 17 (1), 3-21, 2023
强制性开放获取政策： Research Foundation (Flanders), European Commission
Taking a COVID-19 vaccine or not? Do trust in government and trust in experts help us to understand vaccination intention?
J Wynen, S Op de Beeck, K Verhoest, M Glavina, F Six, P Van Damme, ...
Administration & Society 54 (10), 1875-1901, 2022
强制性开放获取政策： Research Foundation (Flanders)
Who refers most? Institutional incentives and judicial participation in the preliminary ruling system
A Dyevre, M Glavina, A Atanasova
Journal of European Public Policy 27 (6), 912-930, 2020
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
To refer or Not to refer, that is the (preliminary) question: Exploring factors which influence the participation of national judges in the preliminary ruling procedure
M Glavina
Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy 16 (1), 25-59, 2020
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Why passive? Exploring national judges’ motives for not requesting preliminary rulings
K Leijon, M Glavina
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 29 (2), 263-285, 2022
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Chilling or Learning?: The effect of negative feedback on interjudicial cooperation in nonhierarchical referral regimes
A Dyevre, N Lampach, M Glavina
Journal of Law and Courts 10 (1), 87-112, 2022
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
A research agenda for trust and distrust in a multilevel judicial system
P Popelier, M Glavina, F Baldan, E Van Zimmeren
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 29 (3), 351-374, 2022
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
The Reality of National Judges as EU Law Judges: Knowledge, Experiences and Attitudes of Lower Court Judges in Slovenia and Croatia
M Glavina
Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy 17 (1), 1-40, 2021
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
National courts as regulatory agencies and the application of EU law
T Nowak, M Glavina
Journal of European Integration 43 (6), 739-753, 2021
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Judicial hierarchy in the preliminary ruling procedure: Exploring the relationship between the first and second instance courts
M Glavina
Available at SSRN 3542302, 2020
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Methodological report on the TiGRE project expert survey
T Bach
ARENA report, 2021
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Uncertainty and legal disintegration: evidence from Brexit
A Dyevre, M Glavina, N Lampach, M Ovadek, W Wijtvliet
Available at SSRN 3276189, 2018
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
From a potentially powerful to a polarised court: the emergence of dissenting opinions on the Croatian Constitutional Court
M Glavina
European Politics and Society 25 (3), 518-536, 2024
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Vertrouwen in de overheid tijdens de covid-19-pandemie: een vergelijking tussen meerdere overheidsniveaus
P Bursens, S De Vadder, M Glavina, P Popelier, E Van Zimmeren, ...
Vlaams tijdschrift voor overheidsmanagement/Vlaams Instituut voor …, 2022
强制性开放获取政策： Research Foundation (Flanders), European Commission
Case selection in the preliminary ruling procedure
A Dyevre, M Glavina, M Ovadek
Austrian Journal of Public Law (Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht),(2021), 2019
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
Judicial Agents and Procedural Dismissals in Heterarchical Court Systems: Chilling or Learning Effect?
A Dyevre, M Glavina, N Lampach
Available at SSRN 3041104, 2017
强制性开放获取政策： European Commission
出版信息和资助信息由计算机程序自动确定