Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy F Cova, B Strickland, A Abatista, A Allard, J Andow, M Attie, J Beebe, ... Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12, 9-44, 2021 | 222 | 2021 |
Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm RM Miller, IR Hannikainen, FA Cushman Emotion 14 (3), 573-587, 2014 | 207 | 2014 |
Nothing at stake in knowledge D Rose, E Machery, S Stich, M Alai, A Angelucci, R Berniūnas, EE Buchtel, ... Noûs 53 (1), 224-247, 2019 | 110 | 2019 |
Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible? IR Hannikainen, E Machery, FA Cushman Cognition 170, 95-101, 2018 | 71 | 2018 |
The Gettier intuition from South America to Asia E Machery, S Stich, D Rose, M Alai, A Angelucci, R Berniūnas, EE Buchtel, ... Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (3), 517-541, 2017 | 60 | 2017 |
For whom does determinism undermine moral responsibility? Surveying the conditions for free will across cultures IR Hannikainen, E Machery, D Rose, S Stich, CY Olivola, P Sousa, ... Frontiers in Psychology 10, 2019 | 54 | 2019 |
Act versus impact: Conservatives and liberals exhibit different structural emphases in moral judgment IR Hannikainen, RM Miller, FA Cushman Ratio 30 (4), 462-493, 2017 | 52 | 2017 |
An experimental guide to vehicles in the park N Struchiner, IR Hannikainen, G Almeida Judgment and Decision Making 15 (3), 312-329, 2020 | 49 | 2020 |
Experimental philosophical bioethics BD Earp, J Demaree-Cotton, M Dunn, V Dranseika, JAC Everett, A Feltz, ... AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (1), 30-33, 2020 | 47 | 2020 |
Fuller and the Folk: The Inner Morality of Law Revisited R Donelson, IR Hannikainen Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy 3, 6-28, 2020 | 41 | 2020 |
Experimental Philosophical Bioethics and Normative Inference BD Earp, J Lewis, V Dranseika, IR Hannikainen Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 42, 91-111, 2021 | 39 | 2021 |
Gender Stereotypes Underlie Child Custody Decisions LLF Costa, ABD Esteves, R Kreimer, N Struchiner, IR Hannikainen European Journal of Social Psychology 49 (3), 548-559, 2019 | 36 | 2019 |
Whose Words Hurt? Contextual Determinants of Offensive Speech M Almagro, IR Hannikainen, N Villanueva Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 48 (6), 937-953, 2022 | 32 | 2022 |
The folk concept of law: Law is intrinsically moral B Flanagan, IR Hannikainen Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1), 165-179, 2022 | 32 | 2022 |
Are There Cross-Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law IR Hannikainen, KP Tobia, GFCF de Almeida, R Donelson, V Dranseika, ... Cognitive Science 45 (8), 2021 | 30 | 2021 |
Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism IR Hannikainen, KP Tobia, GFCF de Almeida, N Struchiner, M Kneer, ... Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44), 2022 | 28* | 2022 |
Rule is a dual character concept G Almeida, N Struchiner, IR Hannikainen Cognition 230 (4), 2023 | 27 | 2023 |
How Do People Use ‘Killing’, ‘Letting Die’ and Related Bioethical Concepts? Contrasting Descriptive and Normative Hypotheses D Rodríguez-Arias, BR López, A Monasterio-Astobiza, IR Hannikainen Bioethics 34 (5), 509-518, 2020 | 26 | 2020 |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross‐cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment F Cova, CY Olivola, E Machery, S Stich, D Rose, M Alai, A Angelucci, ... Mind & Language 34 (3), 317-338, 2019 | 26 | 2019 |
The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system H Viciana, IR Hannikainen, A Gaitan Torres PloS one 14 (7), e0219509, 2019 | 25 | 2019 |