A comparative study of the response of buried pipes under static and moving loads S Alzabeebee, DN Chapman, A Faramarzi Transportation Geotechnics 15, 39-46, 2018 | 83 | 2018 |
Seismic response and design of buried concrete pipes subjected to soil loads S Alzabeebee Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 93, 103084, 2019 | 54 | 2019 |
Development of a novel model to estimate bedding factors to ensure the economic and robust design of rigid pipes under soil loads S Alzabeebee, DN Chapman, A Faramarzi Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 71, 567-578, 2018 | 48 | 2018 |
Dynamic response and design of a skirted strip foundation subjected to vertical vibration S Alzabeebee Geomechanics and Engineering 20 (4), 345-358, 2020 | 46 | 2020 |
The response of buried pipes to UK standard traffic loading S Alzabeebee, D Chapman, I Jefferson, A Faramarzi Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering …, 2017 | 45 | 2017 |
Economical design of buried concrete pipes subjected to UK standard traffic loading S Alzabeebee, DN Chapman, A Faramarzi Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings …, 2019 | 44 | 2019 |
Application of EPR-MOGA in computing the liquefaction-induced settlement of a building subjected to seismic shake S Alzabeebee Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 1), 437-448, 2022 | 43 | 2022 |
Seismic fragility assessment of geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI) for bridge configuration D Forcellini, S Alzabeebee Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 21 (8), 3969-3990, 2023 | 42 | 2023 |
Evolutionary computing to determine the skin friction capacity of piles embedded in clay and evaluation of the available analytical methods S Alzabeebee, DN Chapman Transportation Geotechnics 24, 100372, 2020 | 36 | 2020 |
Seismic settlement of a strip foundation resting on a dry sand S Alzabeebee Natural Hazards 103, 2395–2425, 2020 | 31 | 2020 |
A comparative study of the effect of the soil constitutive model on the seismic response of buried concrete pipes S Alzabeebee Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering 2 (1), 87-96, 2022 | 25 | 2022 |
Experimental study and soft computing modeling of the unconfined compressive strength of limestone rocks considering dry and saturation conditions S Alzabeebee, DA Mohammed, YM Alshkane Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 55 (9), 5535-5554, 2022 | 22 | 2022 |
Numerical Analysis of the Interference of Two Active Machine Foundations S Alzabeebee Geotechnical and Geological Engeering 38, 5043–5059, 2020 | 22 | 2020 |
Response of buried uPVC pipes subjected to earthquake shake S Alzabeebee Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 4 (1), 52, 2019 | 22 | 2019 |
Influence of soil model complexity on the seismic response of shallow foundations S Alzabeebee Geomechanics and Engineering 24 (2), 193-203, 2021 | 21 | 2021 |
Surrogate models to predict maximum dry unit weight, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio form grain size distribution curve S Alzabeebee, SA Mohamad, RKS Al-Hamd Road Materials and Pavement Design 23 (12), 2733-2750, 2022 | 20 | 2022 |
Explicit soft computing model to predict the undrained bearing capacity of footing resting on aggregate pier reinforced cohesive ground S Alzabeebee Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 7 (1), 105, 2022 | 20 | 2022 |
Soft computing of the recompression index of fine-grained soils S Alzabeebee, YM Alshkane, AJ Al-Taie, KA Rashed Soft Computing 25 (24), 15297-15312, 2021 | 20 | 2021 |
Innovative approach to determine the minimum wall thickness of flexible buried pipes S Alzabeebee, DN Chapmana, A Faramarzib Geomechanics and Engineering, An International Journal 15 (2), 755-767, 2018 | 20 | 2018 |
Calibration of a finite element model to predict the dynamic response of a railway track bed subjected to low-and high-speed moving train loads S Alzabeebee Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology 10 (3), 504-520, 2023 | 18 | 2023 |