| Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony DL Faigman (No Title), 2002 | 493 | 2002 |
| To have and have not: Assessing the value of social science to the law as science and policy DL Faigman EmoRy lJ 38, 1005, 1989 | 354 | 1989 |
| Normative Constitutional Fact-Finding: Exploring the Empirical Component of Constitutional Interpretation DL Faigman U. Pa. L. Rev. 139, 541, 1990 | 340 | 1990 |
| Group to individual (G2i) inference in scientific expert testimony DL Faigman, J Monahan, C Slobogin The University of Chicago Law Review, 417-480, 2014 | 307 | 2014 |
| The battered woman syndrome and self-defense: A legal and empirical dissent DL Faigman Virginia Law Review, 619-647, 1986 | 265 | 1986 |
| Check your crystal ball at the courthouse door, please: Exploring the past, understanding the present, and worrying about the future of scientific evidence DL Faigman, E Porter, MJ Saks Cardozo L. Rev. 15, 1799, 1993 | 241 | 1993 |
| The battered woman syndrome in the age of science DL Faigman, AJ Wright Ariz. L. Rev. 39, 67, 1997 | 223 | 1997 |
| Legal alchemy: The use and misuse of science in the law DL Faigman Macmillan, 2000 | 209 | 2000 |
| Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence DL Faigman, AJ Baglioni Jr Law and Human Behavior 12 (1), 1-17, 1988 | 193 | 1988 |
| Modern scientific evidence DL Faigman, D Kaye, M Saks, J Sanders | 152 | 1997 |
| Predicting violent behavior: what can neuroscience add? RA Poldrack, J Monahan, PB Imrey, V Reyna, ME Raichle, D Faigman, ... Trends in cognitive sciences 22 (2), 111-123, 2018 | 123 | 2018 |
| Mapping the labyrinth of scientific evidence DL Faigman Hastings LJ 46, 555, 1994 | 121 | 1994 |
| Failed forensics: How forensic science lost its way and how it might yet find it MJ Saks, DL Faigman Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4, 149-171, 2008 | 117 | 2008 |
| The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert: Is it" scientific,"" technical," or" other" knowledge? DL Faigman Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1 (4), 960, 1995 | 114 | 1995 |
| Neuroscientists in court OD Jones, AD Wagner, DL Faigman, ME Raichle Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14 (10), 730-736, 2013 | 113 | 2013 |
| Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims MJ Saks, T Albright, TL Bohan, BE Bierer, CM Bowers, MA Bush, PJ Bush, ... Journal of Law and the Biosciences 3 (3), 538-575, 2016 | 107 | 2016 |
| Psychological assessments in legal contexts: Are courts keeping “junk science” out of the courtroom? TMS Neal, C Slobogin, MJ Saks, DL Faigman, KF Geisinger Psychological Science in the Public Interest 20 (3), 135-164, 2019 | 104 | 2019 |
| Madisonian balancing: a theory of constitutional adjudication DL Faigman Nw. UL REv. 88, 641, 1993 | 104 | 1993 |
| Constitutional fictions: a unified theory of constitutional facts DL Faigman Oxford University Press, 2008 | 100 | 2008 |
| Reconciling Individual Rights and Government Interests: Madisonian Principles Versus Supreme Court Practice DL Faigman Virginia Law Review, 1521-1580, 1992 | 98 | 1992 |
