Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany J Kaenzig, SL Heinzle, R Wüstenhagen Energy Policy 53, 311-322, 2013 | 339 | 2013 |
Dynamic adjustment of eco‐labeling schemes and consumer choice–the revision of the EU energy label as a missed opportunity? SL Heinzle, R Wüstenhagen Business Strategy and the Environment 21 (1), 60-70, 2012 | 218 | 2012 |
What makes people seal the green power deal?—Customer segmentation based on choice experiment in Germany A Tabi, SL Hille, R Wüstenhagen Ecological Economics 107, 206-215, 2014 | 157 | 2014 |
What are retail investors' risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany S Salm, SL Hille, R Wüstenhagen Energy policy 97, 310-320, 2016 | 156 | 2016 |
Willingness to pay for green products in air travel: Ready for take‐off? G Hinnen, SL Hille, A Wittmer Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (2), 197-208, 2017 | 114 | 2017 |
Advances in understanding energy consumption behavior and the governance of its change–outline of an integrated framework P Burger, V Bezençon, B Bornemann, T Brosch, V Carabias-Hütter, ... Frontiers in energy research 3, 29, 2015 | 110 | 2015 |
The influence of green building certification schemes on real estate investor behaviour: Evidence from Singapore SL Heinzle, A Boey Ying Yip, M Low Yu Xing Urban Studies 50 (10), 1970-1987, 2013 | 110 | 2013 |
Shotgun or snowball approach? Accelerating the diffusion of rooftop solar photovoltaics through peer effects and social norms HC Curtius, SL Hille, C Berger, UJJ Hahnel, R Wüstenhagen Energy policy 118, 596-602, 2018 | 108 | 2018 |
Disclosure of energy operating cost information: A silver bullet for overcoming the energy-efficiency gap? SL Heinzle Journal of Consumer Policy 35 (1), 43-64, 2012 | 104 | 2012 |
Feel good, stay green: Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects G Chatelain, SL Hille, D Sander, M Patel, UJJ Hahnel, T Brosch Journal of environmental psychology 56, 3-11, 2018 | 95 | 2018 |
E-bike trials’ potential to promote sustained changes in car owners mobility habits C Moser, Y Blumer, SL Hille Environmental research letters 13 (4), 044025, 2018 | 78 | 2018 |
Beauty and the budget: A segmentation of residential solar adopters B Petrovich, SL Hille, R Wüstenhagen Ecological Economics 164, 106353, 2019 | 58 | 2019 |
Red is the new blue–The role of color, building integration and country-of-origin in homeowners'preferences for residential photovoltaics SL Hille, HC Curtius, R Wüstenhagen Energy and Buildings 162, 21-31, 2018 | 58 | 2018 |
Consumers’ preferences for electricity-saving programs: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint study S Hille, S Weber, T Brosch Journal of Cleaner Production 220, 800-815, 2019 | 46 | 2019 |
What's driving sustainable energy consumption?: a survey of the empirical literature B Brohmann, S Heinzle, K Rennings, J Schleich, R Wüstenhagen None, 2009 | 35 | 2009 |
Combining “carrot and stick” to incentivize sustainability in households J Mahmoodi, A Prasanna, S Hille, MK Patel, T Brosch Energy Policy 123, 31-40, 2018 | 33 | 2018 |
Best in class or simply the best? The impact of absolute versus relative ecolabeling approaches SL Hille, C Geiger, M Loock, J Peloza Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 37 (1), 5-22, 2018 | 29 | 2018 |
The influence of political orientation on the strength and temporal persistence of policy framing effects S Dharshing, SL Hille, R Wüstenhagen Ecological Economics 142, 295-305, 2017 | 21 | 2017 |
The energy paradox revisited: analyzing the role of individual differences and framing effects in information perception S Dharshing, SL Hille Journal of Consumer Policy 40, 485-508, 2017 | 18 | 2017 |
Using rewards and penalties to promote sustainability: Who chooses incentive‐based electricity products and why? J Mahmoodi, S Hille, MK Patel, T Brosch Journal of Consumer Behaviour 20 (2), 381-398, 2021 | 17 | 2021 |