What does it mean when climate models agree? A case for assessing independence among general circulation models Z Pirtle, R Meyer, A Hamilton environmental science & policy 13 (5), 351-361, 2010 | 96 | 2010 |
Integrating public deliberation into engineering systems: Participatory technology assessment of NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission D Tomblin, Z Pirtle, M Farooque, D Sittenfeld, E Mahoney, R Worthington, ... Astropolitics 15 (2), 141-166, 2017 | 37 | 2017 |
How the models of engineering tell the truth Z Pirtle Philosophy and Engineering:, 95-108, 2010 | 36 | 2010 |
Participatory technology assessment for Mars mission planning: Public values and rationales P Bertrand, Z Pirtle, D Tomblin Space Policy 42, 41-53, 2017 | 22 | 2017 |
Epistemic standards for participatory technology assessment: Suggestions based upon well-ordered science JM Durán, Z Pirtle Science and Engineering Ethics 26, 1709-1741, 2020 | 12 | 2020 |
Where does innovation come from?: Project hindsight, TRACEs, and what structured case studies can say about innovation Z Pirtle, J Moore IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 38 (3), 56-67, 2019 | 9 | 2019 |
On ideals for engineering in democratic societies Z Pirtle, Z Szajnfarber Philosophy and Engineering: Exploring Boundaries, Expanding Connections, 99-112, 2017 | 7 | 2017 |
Modeling Change in Project Duration and Completion: Scheduling Dynamics of NASA's Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) Activities T Wiltshire, J Butner, Z Pirtle Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 21 (3), 335-258, 2017 | 6 | 2017 |
Reimagining conceptions of technological and societal progress Z Pirtle, D Tomblin, G Madhavan Engineering and Philosophy: Reimagining Technology and Social Progress, 1-21, 2021 | 5 | 2021 |
Engineering Model Independence: A Strategy to Encourage Independence Among Models. Z Pirtle, J Odenbaugh, A Hamilton, Z Szajnfarber Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology 22 (2), 2018 | 5 | 2018 |
Engineering innovation: Energy, policy, and the role of engineering Z Pirtle Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process …, 2013 | 5 | 2013 |
Engineering and Philosophy Z Pirtle, D Tomblin, G Madhavan Springer International Publishing, 2021 | 4 | 2021 |
“The One, the Few or the Many?”: Using Independence As a Strategy in Engineering Development and Modeling Z Pirtle, J Odenbaugh, Z Szajnfarber The Future of Engineering: Philosophical Foundations, Ethical Problems and …, 2018 | 4 | 2018 |
Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the ‘Other Sciences’ at the National Science Foundation: by Mark Solovey, MIT Press, 2020, pp. 408, $50 USD (Paperback … Z Pirtle Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (1), 127-131, 2021 | 3 | 2021 |
Artemis, Ethics and Society: Synthesis from a Workshop Z Pirtle, K McBrayer, A Beauchemin Artemis, Ethics and Society: Synthesis from a Workshop, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |
Imagined systems: How the speculative novel infomocracy offers a simulation of the relationship between democracy, technology, and society M Older, Z Pirtle Engineering and Philosophy: Reimagining Technology and Social Progress, 323-339, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
How Engineers Negotiate Domain Boundaries in a Complex, Interdisciplinary Engineering Project G Panther, D Montfort, Z Pirtle American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
Well-Ordered Engineering: Participatory Technology Assessment at NASA Z Pirtle, D Tomblin Pitt, JC. and Shew, A. (eds) Space For the Future: A Companion for the …, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
Participatory technology assessment of NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission D Tomblin, R Worthington, G Gano, M Farooque, D Sittenfeld, D Guston, ... 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, 2015 | 2 | 2015 |
The public informing upstream engineering: A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative Z Pirtle, M Farooque, G Gano, D Guston, A Kaminski, J Kessler, ... AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition, 4651, 2015 | 2 | 2015 |