Law's looking glass: expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images G Edmond, K Biber, R Kemp, G Porter Current issues in criminal justice 20 (3), 337-377, 2009 | 137 | 2009 |
Trashing junk science G Edmond, D Mercer Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 3, 1998 | 104 | 1998 |
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners G Edmond, A Towler, B Growns, G Ribeiro, B Found, D White, ... Science & Justice 57 (2), 144-154, 2017 | 97 | 2017 |
Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals G Edmond, JM Tangen, RA Searston, IE Dror Law, Probability and Risk 14 (1), 1-25, 2015 | 93 | 2015 |
Judicial representations of scientific evidence G Edmond The Modern Law Review 63 (2), 216-251, 2000 | 89 | 2000 |
Australian Evidence A Ligertwood, G Edmond LexisNexis, 2010 | 88* | 2010 |
A contextual approach to the admissibility of the state's forensic science and medical evidence G Edmond, K Roach University of Toronto Law Journal 61 (3), 343-409, 2011 | 79 | 2011 |
Model forensic science G Edmond, B Found, K Martire, K Ballantyne, D Hamer, R Searston, ... Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 48 (5), 496-537, 2016 | 78 | 2016 |
The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial’(2012) G Edmond, M San Roque Current Issues in Criminal Justice 24, 51, 0 | 78* | |
Merton and the hot tub: Scientific conventions and expert evidence in Australian civil procedure G Edmond Law & Contemp. Probs. 72, 159, 2009 | 74 | 2009 |
Conjectures and exhumations: citations of history, philosophy and sociology of science in US federal courts G Edmond, D Mercer Law & Literature 14 (2), 309-366, 2002 | 63 | 2002 |
Procedural fairness, the criminal trial and forensic science and medicine. G Edmond, A Roberts TheSYDNEY LAW REVIEW 33 (3), 359-394, 2011 | 62 | 2011 |
After objectivity: expert evidence and procedural reform G Edmond Sydney L. Rev. 25, 131, 2003 | 62 | 2003 |
Admissibility compared: the reception of incriminating expert evidence (ie, forensic science) in four adversarial jurisdictions G Edmond, S Cole, E Cunliffe, A Roberts U. Denv. Crim. L. Rev. 3, 31, 2013 | 61 | 2013 |
Scientific literacy and the jury: reconsidering jurycompetence' G Edmond, D Mercer Public Understanding of Science 6 (4), 329, 1997 | 59 | 1997 |
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers G Edmond, K Martire, R Kemp, D Hamer, B Hibbert, A Ligertwood, ... Australian Bar Review 39 (174), 2014 | 58 | 2014 |
Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation G Edmond, D Mercer Law & Policy 26 (2), 231-257, 2004 | 58 | 2004 |
Constructing miscarriages of justice: Misunderstanding scientific evidence in high profile criminal appeals G Edmond Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (1), 53-89, 2002 | 58 | 2002 |
Litigation life: Law-science knowledge construction in (Bendectin) mass toxic tort litigation G Edmond, D Mercer Social Studies of Science 30 (2), 265-316, 2000 | 55 | 2000 |
Quasi-justice: Ad hoc expertise and identification evidence G Edmond, M San Roque Criminal Law Journal 33 (1), 8-33, 2009 | 52* | 2009 |