受强制性开放获取政策约束的文章 - Angela Jones了解详情
无法在其他位置公开访问的文章：5 篇
Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence?
AM Jones, AN Bergold, MK Dillon, SD Penrod
Journal of Experimental Criminology 13, 29-52, 2017
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
Henderson Instructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation?
MK Dillon, AM Jones, AN Bergold, CYT Hui, SD Penrod
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 17 (1), 1-24, 2017
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification
AM Jones, S Penrod
Psychology, Crime & Law 24 (2), 177-193, 2018
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
Eyewitnesses in the courtroom: a jury-level experimental examination of the impact of the Henderson instructions
AN Bergold, AM Jones, MK Dillon, S Penrod
Journal of experimental criminology 17, 433-455, 2021
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
Perceptions of access to justice among unrepresented tenants: an examination of procedural justice and deservingness in New York City Housing Court
AM Jones, L Heuer, S Penrod, D Udell
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 19 (1), 72-91, 2019
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
可在其他位置公开访问的文章：2 篇
Research-Based Instructions Induce Sensitivity to Confession Evidence
AM Jones, S Penrod
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 25 (2), 257-272, 2018
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: Judicial instructions fail the test
AM Jones, AN Bergold, S Penrod
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 27 (3), 366-385, 2020
强制性开放获取政策： US National Science Foundation
出版信息和资助信息由计算机程序自动确定