Liminal innovation practices: questioning three common assumptions in responsible innovation M Mertens Journal of responsible innovation 5 (3), 280-298, 2018 | 23 | 2018 |
Can we learn from hidden mistakes? Self-fulfilling prophecy and responsible neuroprognostic innovation M Mertens, OC King, MJAM Van Putten, M Boenink Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (11), 922-928, 2022 | 22 | 2022 |
Self-fulfilling Prophecy in Practical and Automated Prediction OC King, M Mertens Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1-26, 2023 | 7 | 2023 |
Prognostication of patients in coma after cardiac arrest: Public perspectives J van Til, E Bouwers-Beens, M Mertens, M Boenink, ... Resuscitation 169, 4-10, 2021 | 7 | 2021 |
AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges Y Okada, M Mertens, N Liu, SSW Lam, MEH Ong Resuscitation Plus 15, 100435, 2023 | 5 | 2023 |
The responsibility to prevent, the duty to educate Z Lederman, A Cernat, EG Ferri, F Galbo, GMA Levi-Setti, M Mertens, ... Theoretical medicine and bioethics 37, 233-236, 2016 | 4 | 2016 |
Chasing certainty after cardiac arrest: can a technological innovation solve a moral dilemma? M Mertens, J van Til, E Bouwers-Beens, M Boenink Neuroethics 14 (3), 541-559, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
Responsible prediction under critical uncertainty: an epistemic analysis of neuroprognostic innovation practices after cardiac arrest M Mertens Univesity of Twente, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |