[HTML][HTML] Heparin versus bivalirudin in acute myocardial infarction: Unfractionated heparin monotherapy elevated to primary treatment in contemporary percutaneous …

OA Centurión - The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal, 2016 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was developed as an antithrombin agent for patients
undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with the hypothesis that it would …

[HTML][HTML] Bivalirudin versus heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

H Patel, R Garris, S Bhutani, P Shah… - Cardiology …, 2019 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin
versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with acute myocardial infarction who …

Heparin versus bivalirudin in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: A welcome back to an old friend unfractionated heparin

OA Centurión - Critical pathways in cardiology, 2015 - journals.lww.com
The results of randomized trials and observational studies make a strong argument for the
use of bivalirudin rather than heparin plus systematic glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors for …

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta …

A Al-Abdouh, M Mhanna, A Jabri, L Madanat… - Cardiovascular …, 2024 - Elsevier
Background Bivalirudin is an alternative accepted therapy to unfractionated heparin for
patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention …

Bivalirudin versus heparin during intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review of randomized trials

S Bhogal, D Mukherjee, J Bagai… - … Current Drug Targets …, 2020 - ingentaconnect.com
Introduction: Bivalirudin and heparin are the two most commonly used anticoagulants used
during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). The results of Randomized Controlled …

Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta‐analysis of randomized trials

G Ferrante, M Valgimigli, P Pagnotta… - Catheterization and …, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
Background The aim of this study was to assess the impact of bivalirudin, as compared to
unfractionated heparin, on clinical outcomes in patients with ST‐segment elevation …

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

M Verdoia, A Schaffer, L Barbieri… - Revista Española de …, 2016 - Elsevier
Introduction and objectives Contrasting data have been reported on bivalirudin as an
anticoagulation strategy during percutaneous coronary interventions, offering theoretical …

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction

WW Chu, PK Kuchulakanti, B Wang, R Torguson… - Cardiovascular …, 2006 - Elsevier
BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is replacing heparin as the anticoagulant agent of choice for
elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess the safety and …

Bivalirudin vs heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis

R Ebrahimi, AM Lincoff, JA Bittl… - Journal of …, 2005 - journals.sagepub.com
Objective: This study evaluates outcomes with bivalirudin vs heparin in various patient
subgroups and the overall population during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) …

Bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes

M Laine, G Lemesle, T Dabry, V Panagides… - Expert opinion on …, 2019 - Taylor & Francis
Introduction: Anticoagulant therapy is critical to prevent ischemic recurrences and
complications in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous …