Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparins in reduction of cardiac outcomes in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions

S Singh, J Molnar, R Arora - Journal of cardiovascular …, 2007 - journals.sagepub.com
Recent data suggest that bivalirudin, a reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, may be
noninferior to heparins (unfractionated heparin/low molecular weight heparin) in providing …

Bivalirudin vs heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis

R Ebrahimi, AM Lincoff, JA Bittl… - Journal of …, 2005 - journals.sagepub.com
Objective: This study evaluates outcomes with bivalirudin vs heparin in various patient
subgroups and the overall population during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) …

Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

TG Nuehrenberg, W Hochholzer, K Mashayekhi… - Clinical Research in …, 2018 - Springer
Aims The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) for treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial …

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta …

A Al-Abdouh, M Mhanna, A Jabri, L Madanat… - Cardiovascular …, 2024 - Elsevier
Background Bivalirudin is an alternative accepted therapy to unfractionated heparin for
patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention …

Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized …

XQ Liu, XD Luo, YQ Wu - Medicine, 2020 - journals.lww.com
Background: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in
patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane …

Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AH Ahmad Hamdi, AF Dali, TH Mat Nuri… - Frontiers in …, 2017 - frontiersin.org
Recent clinical trials have shown that while bivalirudin exhibits similar efficacy with heparin,
it offers several advantages over heparin, such as a better safety profile. We aimed to …

[PDF][PDF] Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

S Cassese, RA Byrne, KL Laugwitz, H Schunkert… - …, 2015 - academia.edu
Aims: Current recommendations on the use of bivalirudin in patients treated with
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are mostly based on trials comparing bivalirudin …

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

M Verdoia, A Schaffer, L Barbieri… - Revista Española de …, 2016 - Elsevier
Introduction and objectives Contrasting data have been reported on bivalirudin as an
anticoagulation strategy during percutaneous coronary interventions, offering theoretical …

Bivalirudin versus heparin during intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review of randomized trials

S Bhogal, D Mukherjee, J Bagai… - … Current Drug Targets …, 2020 - ingentaconnect.com
Introduction: Bivalirudin and heparin are the two most commonly used anticoagulants used
during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). The results of Randomized Controlled …

The bivalirudin paradox: high evidence, low use

S De Servi, G Mariani, M Mariani… - Journal of …, 2013 - journals.lww.com
A series of trials have shown that bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor that does not require
the cofactor antithrombin III to be effective, is a reasonable alternative to unfractionated …