[PDF][PDF] Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

S Cassese, RA Byrne, KL Laugwitz, H Schunkert… - …, 2015 - academia.edu
Aims: Current recommendations on the use of bivalirudin in patients treated with
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are mostly based on trials comparing bivalirudin …

Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients planned for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

MA Cavender, MS Sabatine - The Lancet, 2014 - thelancet.com
Background Bivalirudin is an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous
coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to define the effects of a bivalirudin-based …

Meta-analysis of effects of bivalirudin versus heparin on myocardial ischemic and bleeding outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

AEB Perez, SV Rao, SJ Jolly, SB Pancholy… - The American Journal of …, 2016 - Elsevier
Bivalirudin is an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulation during
percutaneous coronary intervention. Previously, we have reported clinical benefit on major …

Bivalirudin versus heparin during intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review of randomized trials

S Bhogal, D Mukherjee, J Bagai… - … Current Drug Targets …, 2020 - ingentaconnect.com
Introduction: Bivalirudin and heparin are the two most commonly used anticoagulants used
during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). The results of Randomized Controlled …

Impact of baseline hemorrhagic risk on the benefit of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with coronary angioplasty: a meta-regression …

G Tarantini, SJ Brener, A Barioli, A Gratta, G Parodi… - American Heart …, 2014 - Elsevier
Background Bivalirudin significantly reduces 30-day major and minor bleeding compared
with unfractionated heparin (UFH), while resulting in similar or lower rates of ischemic …

Critical appraisal of bivalirudin versus heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

AA Bavry, IY Elgendy, A Mahmoud, MP Jadhav… - PLoS One, 2015 - journals.plos.org
Percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin plus bail-out glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
inhibitors has been shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin plus routine …

Bivalirudin vs heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis

R Ebrahimi, AM Lincoff, JA Bittl… - Journal of …, 2005 - journals.sagepub.com
Objective: This study evaluates outcomes with bivalirudin vs heparin in various patient
subgroups and the overall population during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) …

Comparison of patient outcomes with bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention

K Watson, AL Seybert, MI Saul, JS Lee… - … : The Journal of …, 2007 - Wiley Online Library
Objective. To compare clinical outcomes and glycoprotein IIb‐IIIa inhibitor use in patients
undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who received bivalirudin or …

[HTML][HTML] Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction

D Erlinge, E Omerovic, O Fröbert… - … England Journal of …, 2017 - Mass Medical Soc
Background The comparative efficacy of various anticoagulation strategies has not been
clearly established in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are undergoing …

[HTML][HTML] Bivalirudin versus heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials stratified by adjunctive …

M Anantha-Narayanan, D Anugula… - Journal of thoracic …, 2018 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background Bivalirudin has been shown to be associated with less major bleeding than
heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); but the …