… identified in this scoping review was that “rapid reviews have a protocol describing objectives,
scope, PICO, and approach”, although this is more around the process of developing an …

… The method of scoping review was found feasible, as we were interested in identifying,
reporting and discussing different concepts and their characteristics. The measures to achieve …

… systematic reviews and meta-analyses, scoping reviews have a wider conceptual range and
focus, and are inclusive of broader study objectives and methodologies (… quality evaluation, …

… both similarities and differences between rapid and systematic review methods. Short-cuts …
by systematic reviews. Albeit, existing comparisons of rapid and systematic reviews revealed …

… features and methods We conducted a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of
… or more of the 216 RRs and 90 methods articles included [22]. We also undertook a second …

… six rapid review approaches compared to systematic reviews (Table 1). These were identified
as being the most frequently used approaches through a scoping review of rapid review …

… approaches to rapid reviewing and propose issues to consider when selecting appropriate
rapid review methods for … blurred and many published systematic reviews use rapid methods. …

… less systematic than standard systematic reviews, and the introduction of bias must be avoided.
In this article, we describe what rapid reviews … of rapid reviews and systematic reviews. …

… rapid reviews, and for simplification purposes, we define these review types as ‘systematic
reviews … discussed the choice between a rapid or systematic review approach as we are of the …

… methodology published since the initial scoping review that underpinned our interim
guidance in 2020.To identify potentially relevant studies, we used the option for similar articles in …