… In disaggregate models, trip distribution is referred to as ‘destination choice’. … a gravity
model and multinomial logit destination choice model for Maryland and compared the results. …

… of destination choices for intercity trips applying nonparametric … of the destination choice
through traditional gravity models and … of Gravity Model 2 is to minimize differences between trip …

… Comparison between gravity and destination choice models for trip distribution in Maryland.
In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, …

… The trip distribution portion of the model employs a destination … All the model coefficients of
destination choice models are listed in … “Comparison between Gravity and Destination Choice …

… Despite their effectiveness in modeling trip distribution, aggregated approaches have …
Comparison between Gravity and Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution in Maryland. …

… distribution is based on calibrating the Gravity distribution … a comparison between ANNs,
MNL and NL models taking into … urban destination choice problem, which is a large choice set …

… most likely to capture local spatial spillovers varies depending on the economic sector
examined, reflecting differences between sectors in operations and location choice criteria. …

… into account if the trip distribution model is segmented for specific … Destination choice
models are therefore unlike matrix fitting models like the gravity model, which fit the entire travel …

… totals into destinations. Since we define origin propulsiveness and destination attractiveness
in terms of such totals, we would want to include these totals in the gravity model instead of …

… We analyze different forms of log-linear and gravity models for treating … compared the
estimated inter-district trips based on Model 2 and Model 6 to demonstrate the difference between …