Comparison of static and dynamic characteristics of 1550 nm quantum dash and quantum well lasers

B Shi, S Pinna, W Luo, H Zhao, S Zhu, STS Brunelli… - Optics …, 2020 - opg.optica.org
Optics Express, 2020opg.optica.org
Compared to quantum well (QW) lasers, lower dimensional quantum dot (QD) or quantum
dash (QDash) devices demonstrate superior performances, owing to their quantized energy
levels and increased carrier confinement. Here, we report the systematic comparison of
static and dynamic properties of long wavelength (1550 nm) QDash and QW lasers. For the
QDash lasers, a higher maximum operating temperature and lower temperature
dependence was achieved for long cavities, although the threshold current densities were …
Compared to quantum well (QW) lasers, lower dimensional quantum dot (QD) or quantum dash (QDash) devices demonstrate superior performances, owing to their quantized energy levels and increased carrier confinement. Here, we report the systematic comparison of static and dynamic properties of long wavelength (1550 nm) QDash and QW lasers. For the QDash lasers, a higher maximum operating temperature and lower temperature dependence was achieved for long cavities, although the threshold current densities were larger than the QW reference devices. The lasing characteristics for QDashes are significantly improved following the application of a high reflectance (HR) coating on the rear facets. The QDash lasers also exhibit three orders lower dark current, of 45 µA/cm^2 under -1 V reverse bias. Small signal modulation on the 4 × 550 µm^2 Fabry-Perot cavities yields a modulation efficiency of 0.48 GHz/√mA and a maximum 3-dB bandwidth of 7.4 GHz for QDashes, slightly larger than that for the QW devices. Meanwhile, a stronger damping effect was observed for the QDash lasers due to their lower differential gain.
opg.optica.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果