Decision making framework based Fermatean fuzzy integrated weighted distance and TOPSIS for green low-carbon port evaluation

S Yang, Y Pan, S Zeng - Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022 - Elsevier
S Yang, Y Pan, S Zeng
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022Elsevier
Green low-carbon port (GLCP) development and evaluation have gained increase attention
in recent years. However, the uncertain assessment procedure and complex index in the
GLCP assessment has brought great challenges to achieve a consensus for decision. To
solve above problems, this study aims to present a novel decision making framework based
on Fermatean fuzzy integrated weighted distance measure and Technique for Order of
Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach for the GLCP evaluation. The …
Abstract
Green low-carbon port (GLCP) development and evaluation have gained increase attention in recent years. However, the uncertain assessment procedure and complex index in the GLCP assessment has brought great challenges to achieve a consensus for decision. To solve above problems, this study aims to present a novel decision making framework based on Fermatean fuzzy integrated weighted distance measure and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach for the GLCP evaluation. The Fermatean fuzzy integrated weighted average distance (FFIWAD) measure is first proposed, which takes into account the subjective significance of the variables and the attitudinal characteristics of decision makers. A FFIWAD-TOPSIS decision making framework is then developed, wherein the weights of index are determined by entropy method, and the FFIWAD is applied to calculate the distance between each alternative and the positive (or negative) ideal solution. Moreover, on the basis of the constructed index system of GLCP evaluation, the presented FFIWAD-TOPSIS method is applied to assess the development status GLCP of five major ports in China. The case analysis shows that Guangzhou Port behaves the best comprehensive performance among the five cities, while Shenzhen Port is the worst. Finally, the sensitivity analysis, as well as comparative analysis of the presented model are conducted.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果