… Shafee et al (2017) believe that “Wikipedia is set to retain its position as a key public health
… “to ensure that medical content is accurate in the world’s most consulted encyclopedia” [14]. …

… Wikipedia is a primary source for public health information, many health care professionals
reject Wikipedia … a resident Wikipedian (Wikipedia expert), we then used Wikipedia’s tracking …

… , Wikipedia courses have been integrated into health professions schools’ curriculum. This
literature review and curricular inventory of Wikipedia … the potential impact on public health [3, …

… by the World Bank. Using the latent embeddings of nearby geolocated Wikipedia articles to
predict the wealth level of geographic locales, we demonstrate that, on its own, Wikipedia is …

… a detour via Wikipedia. We conclude that Wikipedia regularly and systematically meets
information needs that search engines do not meet, which further confirms Wikipedia’s central …

… Similar to Wikipedia, entries were reviewed by a hierarchy of volunteers based on training
… It has been asserted that the next iteration of public health promotion will need to employ …

… Through this exploration of these frames we see that learning to contribute to Wikipedia offers
an incredibly effective way to build the necessary skills to enable what the Framework calls …

… Wikipedia. Perhaps our readers are fond of using Wikipedia, or perhaps they follow stories
about it with interest. Perhaps they even contribute to Wikipedia, a little or a lot. Or, perhaps, …

… -cited articles on topics such as molecular biology and immunology and slightly fewer on
clinical medicine and public health, are fully explained away by article-level effects. …

… Wikipedia’s role in providing reliable public health information was also recognized fairly
early in the pandemic by a number of news sources across the web. A few notable titles in …